Home › Blog › Why Eye Appeal Is Here to Stay

Why Eye Appeal Is Here to Stay

Published October 31, 2026 · 10 min read · By Mack Cheli, founder of GrailGuard

Graig Miller and I first crossed paths at the West Coast Card Show, where I was set up at a table, and got to know each other properly at the National this summer. Graig runs MidLife Sports Cards, and he recently asked me on to talk about the topic I think about more than almost any other in this hobby: eye appeal. Is it here to stay, or is it a phase?

My answer is that it is here to stay, and over the course of the hour we got into why. We talked about why the number on a slab may not hold up the way the look of a card will, how to price a card the comps can't, why a signed vintage rookie is my favorite thing to own, and why I ended up building a company around moving cards like these safely.

The full episode is below. Under it is the written version, edited for reading.

Vintage from day one

My dad got me into cards when I was five, and he went straight to vintage. My first card was a Rickey Henderson rookie, and it has been vintage ever since. He still comes to the National with me every year. That is our annual trip together, and he gets all the credit for how much I love this.

Over time I narrowed the collection down, and, as I joked on the show, made it extra complicated. My personal collection is signed Hall of Fame rookie cards with great eye appeal. Nearly everything we looked at on the episode fits that rule.

Better-looking cards always cost more. What changed is how much more.

Graig opened with the question underneath the whole conversation. Collectors have always preferred centered, clean cards. But over the last couple of years, the gap between a high-eye-appeal 8 and an off-center 8 has grown dramatically. Why now?

I think there are a few forces at once. The first is money. As more of it has come into the hobby, collectors have gone looking for ways to set their collections apart, and the look of a card is one of the clearest ways to do that. It is also how I started. I would look for the best copy in a mid-tier grade, one that could hold its own visually next to a 7 or an 8, and keep the difference in price for the next card I wanted.

The second is that standardized, third-party ways of describing eye appeal have arrived, and I think that is a net benefit for the hobby. The third is the one I feel most strongly about:

I think just AI in general is going to be added more and more into collectibles, hobby, and spaces like ours.Mack Cheli, on MidLife Sports Cards

A trimmed or altered card can get past the human eye and into a high-grade holder. As detection technology improves, some of those cards will be found out. If that happens, I would rather have spent a fifth of the money on a beautiful 5 that already holds its own next to an 8 than a quarter of a million dollars on a high-grade card that may have been altered somewhere along the way.

The number may not hold up. The look will.

Graig said it more cleanly than I did. Grading is not perfect, and some cards were graded under different standards years ago. So the thing that may not hold up is the number, and the thing that will hold up is the eye appeal.

He brought two examples to make the point. The first was a 1993 Finest Refractor Roger Clemens in a PSA 10 that is clearly off-center, somewhere between 60/40 and 70/30 by his read, with visible surface issues. PSA's published standard for a 10 calls for centering of approximately 55/45 or better on the front. The second was an N28 Allen & Ginter King Kelly, one of the most beautiful sets ever made, graded a PSA 4 despite two visible stains, a scrape across the face, and a scratch. Graig read PSA's own standards and noted the card would barely fit a 3 by them.

Anyone who paid full 10 or full 4 money for those cards bought the number, not the card. Graig's view, and mine, is that the number has been king for thirty years and will not stay king forever.

Then he put up one of mine: a 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson in an SGC 2.5. My answer was simple. Take the label away and anyone who loves that set will look at it and want it, whether the holder says 1 or 5. The centering is strong and the colors are sharp. With the true classics, like that Jackie or a 1953 Bowman Pee Wee Reese, the image is so iconic that the grade starts to matter less than what is actually in front of you. The price becomes the second question.

How to price a card the comps can't

Graig asked the most practical question of the night: if the number is no longer the whole guide, how do you value a card like that Jackie?

I think people get this wrong on both sides of the table. Some collectors don't realize their cards are worth more than the grade suggests. My test is replacement. Take my 1955 Topps Sandy Koufax rookie in a PSA 7. It has a small print defect in the top left, but the centering and color are excellent. How often does another copy like that come up?

If the answer is once a year, then you probably should not look at comps.Mack Cheli, on MidLife Sports Cards

For cards like that, I start at the top of the comp range and sometimes go higher, depending on how hard the card is to replace. These cards were never meant to last this long. Nobody printing Allen & Ginter in the 1880s imagined them as collectibles in 2026. The ones that survived in great shape just don't come to market often. When they do, it is either an auction that finds the real price or a seller who names one. If you only look at comps, I think you sell yourself short, on the buy side and the sell side.

I am a collector first. When I sell, it is usually to fund a better card for my own collection, with better eye appeal or a better signature. That same mindset is how we run GrailGuard.

Graig followed with two more Jackies of mine: a 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson in a PSA 2.5 with very strong centering and red, and a second 1948 Leaf Jackie in an SGC 1.5. Both are brutal cards to find centered without heavy print snow.

Why vintage, and why history

I played baseball in high school and college, and I do collect a few guys I played with because I have a personal tie to them. Vintage is different. I never got to watch Mickey Mantle or Jackie Robinson play. What draws me is history: what these players accomplished, and, with Jackie Robinson and Roberto Clemente, what they did for all of us as a society. I used to tell my parents that if there were more money in it, I would have been a history teacher.

That got a laugh, because Graig is a history teacher. He has taught for 25 years and is in his first year teaching U.S. history to middle schoolers. He also studied marketing at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, which is why, in his words, he can't stop looking for the fix whenever he sees a problem in the hobby.

The other half of it for me is that these cards are art. I would rather show a friend a 1953 Bowman Reese than a piece by an artist I don't know that someone told me would go up. My friends can connect the image to their own days playing ball.

Does eye appeal matter for modern?

It does, but differently. The Clemens 10 is a good example: a perfectly centered, clean copy of that card should bring more than that one. I use Eye Appeal Inc's site, and GrailGuard now has a partnership with them. With a modern card, though, I find myself hunting for what is wrong, because today we expect perfection, and it is hard to say why one copy of a 2026 Jacob Misiorowski rookie is better than the next. With vintage, I am appreciating how well a card has survived for seventy years. I see real use for eye appeal on rarer '90s cards. On ultra-modern, much less.

Signed vintage rookies

Graig asked what draws me to autographs: the player holding the card, the story, the scarcity, or the upside. Honestly, all of them.

Think about what kids want when they open a pack of Topps Chrome today: the autograph. Logically, I think demand for signed vintage keeps growing as those collectors get older. And as a history fan, it is hard to beat the idea that Jackie Robinson held a card and signed it.

I also think the authentication question mirrors the grading question. If you trust a third party to tell you a card from 1952 is a 9, you are trusting the same kind of expert to tell you the signature is real. I am sure every major grading company has some fake autographs in its holders, the same way there are trimmed or altered cards sitting in 7, 8, 9 and 10 holders. As technology improves, some signatures may be called into question, the same way some high grades may be. That is the world we collect in, and it is why authenticators matter.

Graig's take was that the grading companies have more to lose than gain on autographs. Approving a fake is a scandal, while rejecting a real one is an inconvenience, so they lean heavily toward caution.

The best part of signed cards, for me, is the stories. A few years ago I won several 1955 Topps Roberto Clemente rookies that are badly trimmed, with the borders gone. After the auction, the family reached out. Their grandfather got the cards signed as a kid at the ballpark during Clemente's first two seasons, before Clemente was Clemente. I could not care less about the borders. That provenance is the card.

On the show I also debuted a new one I hadn't posted anywhere yet: a signed 1955 Topps Clemente with its borders intact. The signature is fainter, but anyone who collects eye appeal knows how hard it is to find a reasonably centered Clemente. I had to have it.

Graig added a point I had not considered. Watching the coverage of the 2023 National, which he did not attend, he noticed that signed vintage was one of the biggest topics of the show. Modern collectors chase two things, the autograph and scarcity, and signed vintage has both. Some of these players did not sign cards often. There are stories of Mantle refusing to sign vintage cards because he thought he would ruin them.

The cards

Why I built GrailGuard

This is the part of the hour that connects to what we do. Graig told a story that will sound familiar to anyone in the hobby. He owns an Allen & Ginter pirates card, a Blackbeard, with only around 35 examples known. When he wanted it reholdered, he didn't want to mail even a roughly $7,000 card, so he dropped it off in person at the National and paid about $150 for fast turnaround just to get it back in his hands sooner. When he recently mailed an expensive card, he tracked it all week until it arrived.

That fear is why GrailGuard exists. I was tired of being scared every time I sold a big card. With vintage, there is an extra dimension: even if a carrier pays out, a lost card is lost to history. It may sit in a sorting facility for years.

In short form, GrailGuard is a white-glove, hand-delivered courier service:

If you want the details on how a trip works from pickup to handoff, our hand-delivery courier guide walks through it. If you want the reason it matters, read our piece on the nearly $1 million graded-card theft from a delivery truck in Santa Ana.

Escrow, as one more option

On the show I shared that we just opened a beta for escrow. Today, a lot of big deals in this hobby run on trust and references: someone we both know vouches for you, so I feel comfortable sending you $50,000. Our goal is to give collectors a protected alternative. With escrow, the buyer's money is held by a licensed, regulated escrow company, never by GrailGuard, until the card is hand-delivered. There will also be a standalone option for deals that don't need a courier.

Graig pointed out that this lets two people who have already found each other close a private deal without handing a large share to a middleman. I want to be clear about one thing I said on air: this is not a knock on auction houses. Our goal is to partner with every auction house, I use them constantly, and I would not be where I am without many of them. Graig's real estate comparison was a good one. Sometimes a realtor is the right call. Sometimes you already have a buyer and just need a safe way to close. Escrow is another option for the second case.

The through-line

Near the end, Graig said something I will borrow: some cards just can't be lost. They may not be the most valuable cards ever, but they are irreplaceable, and those are the ones that have to make it from point A to point B. That is the same instinct behind eye appeal. Don't let a number stand in for the thing itself. Look at the card. And when it has to travel, put it in the hands of someone who will look after it.

Thank you to Graig and MidLife Sports Cards for having me, and to the Sports Card Clubhouse. We are proud to partner with both.